職場で利用するために何故か私が購入しました。私の部署で使う訳でも無いのですが。実際使用している部署に聞くと非常に良いとのことでした。選択の多い中でPCとの相性というか汎用性のあるのならオススメ出来ると思います。

the printing quality was exactly like those ones developed in photo studio.and water/dirt proofi need to assist my kids to print pictures for their school paper, this machine can gather up to 8 pics in a sheet, which can save lot of moneyand this printer can also print ID photos!!!

Nice product. A bit expensive but nice

The quality of the pictures is outstanding. After reading other people's comments, the settings I use are:Image optimize: OffBrightness: +1Color: VividI connected it to my iPhone easily and then I hooked it up to my wifi so I can print it from my MacBook. It takes maybe 10 seconds to think about the picture before printing over wifi, then it zips the picture back and forth a few times and it's done. Pictures looks great and the paper itself is flat enough to glue into a scrapbook without curling.I LOVE that it comes with just enough "ink" as sheets of paper. I never have to wonder if I will have enough ink, or run to the store for an expensive color cartridge because I ran out of yellow, etc. If I have paper I have ink. Easy.Now, there are some cons. A minor one is that it will forget your settings when you turn off the printer so you have to remember to set them again. A bigger issue, and one that makes me a little nutty, is that it crops the top and bottom off and the paper doesn't end up being a true 4x6. It's 1/16" smaller than 4" and a little more than 1/8" smaller than 6". I've gotten around the cropping by adding a border of 10 in the app Moldiv. I then add a bigger bottom border since it cuts more off the bottom than the top. Now there's very limited cropping. I don't really care that it's smaller than 4x6, but I would definitely rather it be a standard size if I had the choice.

Good product , cost efficient , easy to take instant prints . Photo clarity is not impressing but still just for 7500 this is good.

This is a good photo printer. I have used this from printing on my phone and then on my computer. It is easy to use and require basic internet and computer knowledge. The printed picture quality varies from the image quality. There are times some pictures appear off colored, smudged, too dark, and too light. However, I felt that is a limitation of this printing device because it uses 3 colors. The printing speed is alright. It is not fast but understandably slow. It accommodates 4 x 6 photo sizes and you get 5 photo paper and a cartridge as part of the package. There is no provided USB cable to connect from computer to this device. You have to get your own. Wifi capability is the way I print my photos from computer to this printer. Moreover, this device doesn't overheat quickly but might get very warm on prolonged use.

Lousy and inexcusable of Canon to NOT support Win 10 or Win 8 with this product! Don't buy unless you are smart enough to find the clues to downloading old Win 7 drivers and before that, going into Win 8 or later and disabling Window's 'digital signatures' (allows you to load Win 7 Canon Selphy driver) and then rebooting to turn back on digital signature for your PC'c OS. Follow that? If you do...then go ahead and buy one of these and enjoy the nice quick prints available with this technology (far better than ink jet!). If you DON'T understand the preceding, go look on the web for 'work arounds' for loading printer drivers for the Canon Selphy for Windows 8 and 10. You won't find this on the Canon site! You won't find the Canon tech support suggesting you do this...but it's what I needed to do last year when I went from Win 7 to Win 8.1 to keep my Canon Selphy CP900 operational. OK, so a quick review of the CP1200: Had a Canon CP800 for a couple of years and liked the technology for the print and the convenience of pretty-much instant 4x6 prints that were durable and where the ink wouldn't run. The CP800 died after 3 or so years...and I replaced it with a CP900 that worked until a few months ago. (This is the one that I had to figure out how to get around the fact that Canon has NO drivers for camera for Win 8 (or 8.1) or Win 10!) After failure of the heating element inside and frying the ink cartridge, Canon tech support suggested I trash the CP900 since it was 'gone'. Actually, i was surprised to find that the newest of the Selphys - their CP1200 - still wasn't supported with current Windows drivers...but, hey I figured out how to work-around that last time. Disabling 'digital signatures' worked again for this model, so I again have a printer - probably one of a few years until it, too, finally dies. Two items: There are two versions of the paper/ink packages, the KP-18IN and the newer RP-108. They are essentially the same in the end, but number of prints per cartridge is slightly different, but the same for the whole shebang in the end. Why, Canon? And it's pretty expensive per print - I pay about $29 for 108 prints - about a quarter print. Bit, then again, it's instant pictures. Hope this helps others. Shame on you, Canon.

I was just about to pull the trigger on the CP910 when I saw that the CP1200 had been launched at CES this year. I can't comment on the CP910 or any previous Selphy model as I'm new to the dedicated small photo printer world. I did buy a Polaroid ZIP very recently, but after a few test prints, decided to return it in favor of continued searching. That's when I stumbled across this Canon model (CP1200). I re-printed the same images on the Canon, albeit in a larger format to compare to the ones from the ZIP. The difference in image quality is rather significant and the quality award goes to the Canon, hands-down. The pictures are brighter and have a better, more natural tone than what came out of the ZINK-based printer. That said, there are still pros and cons.Pros:1. Image quality. If this printer is likely to primarily stay at home to print, this should be the dominant factor in selection2. Multiple format options available - adhesive back options (like ZINK) make it very convenient for scrapbooking and other projectsa. 4"x6" (KP-108IN - NOT adhesive backed ) - I've tried this size onlyb. 2.1"x3.4" (KC-18IF - with adhesive back)c. 2.1"x2.1" square (KC-18IS with adhesive back)d. 2.1"x3.4" (KC-18IL ), split into 8 small postage-stamp sized stickers (expensive on a per-sheet basis)3. Connects to home Wifi so that any device using the Canon app can see it (I'm not sure whether this includes PCs and Macs, but works great for iPhones and iPads)4. *Can* be battery operated - If you use this primarily at home, this won't be an issue...see Con #1 below for counter point5. Cost per print - for 4"x6" prints, the cost per print is cheaper than other dedicated photo printers, but since most don't do this size, it may not be as much of a pro versus going to an online printing site or local drugstoreCons:1. Canon OEM battery is MASSIVELY overpriced and costs almost as much as the printer ($80-$90 list price)2. Physical size. This print is a LOT bigger than the ZINK-based competitors plus it has a huge paper tray hanging out the front to hold the blank paper prior to printing whereas the others use paper small enough to fit completely inside the printer. Again, if always used at home, this probably isn't a big deal...you're paying for the flexibility in print sizing and different printing mechanism (dye-sublimation vs embedded crystals). Also, if you go ahead and get the battery, it does become truly portable...as long as you're willing to carry it.3. Takes a little longer to print than the ZIP although this is a minor con as both printers take 50-70 seconds from the time you press the button on the app until the photo can be picked up4. Cost per print - Price per sheet of the smaller sizes (2.1"x3.4" and smaller) start at around $0.60/ea and go up from there, which is cheaper than Instax, but more expensive than the ZIP, so that depends on what you want to do with it. I appreciate the flexibility in options, personally.Final thoughts...If you are looking for an easy to use photo-only printer where you don't need to print larger than 4"x6" prints and are doing low-medium quantities of printing, this should be a very solid option. If you need larger prints, just go get a real full-size printer. The flexibility of the Canon to do 4x6 and the smaller sizes (even though they're a bit more expensive) is really nice. I like to attach small pics to letters and journals, so this is perfect for that use. However, if portability reigns supreme in your hierarchy of needs, either pony up the insane price for the battery (which states it can do about 50+ prints per charge) or you may need to look at a different printer option.Hopefully this helps!